It seems to me that there is a huge gulf between the radical right, who
truly believe the anti-all-government crap that seems the lifeblood of contemporary right-wing rhetoric, and the mainstream right,
who enjoy the same rhetoric, while not actually believing it. They
actually believe in libraries, schools, medicare, social security, etc.
But the radical right is so energetic and passionate... here's the
question: why do moderates let them get away it, why do they pretend to
agree?
On the left, there doesn't seem to be at all this kind of schism. You
rarely hear for the outright abolishment of business. And if you did,
the rest of the left wouldn't dream of pretending to agree.
I tend to think this is historical. Communism as a politically correct
philosophy died a long time ago. Total free marketism is alive and
well, despite routinely demonstrating massive failings. Reasonable
people understand this, and advocate a mixed economy. So again, why
does the right allow radical idiocy to invade their rhetoric?
I'm reminded of the radio right, in which half-truths are routinely
bandied about, with a sort of wink-and-nod - we don't really think that
(or do we)? It's a comfort with factual relativism that seems to baffle the left.
No comments:
Post a Comment